Before you choose the property
Start with the rules that actually shape the project.
The Mizoram tourist-trade statute expressly includes homestays inside its accommodation/hotel regulatory framework.
The published homestay guideline uses a resident owner/promoter and family model.
Both the guideline and Annexure E support a five-room ceiling, while Annexure E also fixes a ten-bed ceiling.
Scope: Source-checked regulatory and business-planning guidance. It does not approve a particular title, building, tax position, food activity or operating structure.
01 / Executive finding
The practical starting point
- Mizoram has a state-specific statutory tourist-trade regime. The Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) Act, 2020 applies throughout Mizoram; its statutory definition of “hotel” expressly includes homestays, B&Bs, guest houses, lodges and resorts. A person intending to operate a hotel must apply for registration before operation. [S1, ss. 1, 2(i), 9; PDF pp. 31–35]
- The principal operating material located for homestays is the Tourism Department's Homestay Guidelines, 2020, Notification No. C.31012/3/2020-TOUR/9 dated 28 August 2020, read with the 2020 Rules, their 2021 amendment and the 18 August 2021 homestay corrigendum. [S2–S5, compendium pp. 45–110, 170–182]
- This guide cannot certify that those materials contain every rule currently in force because the Mizoram Legislative Assembly's official List of Business records that The Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) (Amendment) Rules, 2026 were laid before the House on 2 March 2026, but the complete notified/gazetted text was Not stated in the current official material reviewed during this review. [S24, List of Business, item 3(i)]
- A separate Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) (Amendment) Bill, 2026 was introduced and passed by the Assembly on 24 February 2026. The official Assembly material reviewed did not establish final assent/commencement; its purpose included expanding regulation to parks, picnic spots and recreation centres. It must not be treated here as enacted law without the assent/gazette instrument. [S23, Bill No. 40/2026]
- The published homestay eligibility guideline says the owner/promoter should own the property and should physically reside with the family either in the same homestay unit or on the same premises/campus in close proximity. It describes eligible houses as those owned by individuals/families. No separate Mizoram domicile or permanent-resident certificate requirement was located in the reviewed homestay provisions. [S4, eligibility items 1–3; PDF pp. 173–174]
- The guideline permits not more than five tourist rooms, each with toilet facilities. Annexure E of the Rules creates a material inconsistency by requiring a minimum of three lettable rooms and a maximum of five rooms/ten beds. A truthful one- or two-room proposal therefore requires a written Tourism Department determination. [S4, eligibility item 3; S2, Annexure E, PDF p. 65] The official sources are not aligned.
- Baseline dimensional standards located are 100 sq ft for a single room, 120 sq ft for a double room and 30 sq ft for a bathroom. Annexure E also covers attached bathrooms, hot/cold water, dining, kitchen hygiene, fire equipment, waste, parking, first aid, smoke/heat detectors and public-liability insurance. [S2, Annexure E, PDF pp. 65–66; S4, eligibility standards]
- Homestays are classified Gold, Silver or Bronze. Annexure F uses a 100-point assessment: Gold 75+; Silver 50–74; Bronze below 50. Some items such as internet availability contribute classification points and are not independently shown as baseline legal conditions. [S2, Annexure F]
- For hotel registration, the notified prescribed authority is the Director of Tourism for the whole of Mizoram, with SDO (Sadar)/SDO (Civil) acting for their concerned sub-divisions under the notification. The statutory appellate authority is the Secretary, Tourism Department and revisional authority the Chief Secretary. [S7, Notification No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR/11, 14 September 2020; PDF p. 250]
- The homestay guideline states a three-year registration/classification validity. It calls for reclassification sufficiently before expiry and addresses renewal fees before expiry, but the exact renewal workflow on the live authenticated portal was not inspectable without creating an account. [S4, validity/renewal provisions, PDF p. 176]
- The 31 July 2020 fee notification historically prescribed ₹20 processing, three-year registration fees of ₹9,000 Gold/₹6,000 Silver/₹3,000 Bronze, and renewal at 50% of the corresponding registration charge. Crucially, that notification expressly fixed its rates “for a period of 3 years.” No subsequent official fee notification was located. Current Tourism registration, renewal and processing fees: Not stated in the current official material reviewed. [S6, PDF p. 244]
- The state has a live 2026 Tourism registration portal whose unauthenticated signup page collects name, email, “Register As”, district, phone, address and password. The actual post-login homestay form, current declarations, upload limits, fee screen and certificate-download process were not inspected because no applicant account was created. [S8, public registration page]
- A second major applicant-structure conflict exists: the Homestay Guidelines say the owner/promoter should own the property, while Form 3 expressly asks whether title is “owned/leased” and calls for sale/lease deeds; the document list also recognizes a Lease Certificate. A lessee should not be advertised as clearly eligible until this is resolved in writing. [S4, eligibility item 1; S2, Form 3, PDF pp. 76–77] The official sources are not aligned.
- Foreign-guest accommodation reporting is now governed nationally by the Immigration and Foreigners Rules, 2025: an accommodation keeper, expressly including a homestay, must electronically report prescribed foreigner details in Form III within 24 hours of arrival, report departure within 24 hours and keep electronic records for at least one year. [S11, r.17; Gazette pp. 26–27]
- There is currently enough official material to design a serious pre-application due-diligence process, but not enough to publish current fees or present the 2020/2021 homestay text as exhaustively current until the complete 2026 Amendment Rules are obtained and the identified room/title conflicts are resolved.
02 / Document chronology
Use the current rules and implementation
- 2020 — Mizoram Responsible Tourism Policy 2020. Background policy appears in the Tourism compendium. It informs state tourism policy but is not a substitute for the statutory registration scheme. [Tourism compendium]
- 2020 — Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) Act, 2020. Establishes the statutory registration framework and applies across Mizoram. [S1]
- 2020 — Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) Rules, 2020. Implements applications, forms, registration processes and schedules. [S2]
- 31 July 2020 — fee notification No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR. Sets fees expressly for three years. [S6]
- 28 August 2020 — Homestay Guidelines, No. C.31012/3/2020-TOUR/9. Establish homestay eligibility, registration, classification, inspection and operating conditions. [S4]
- 14 September 2020 — authority notification No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR/11. Identifies prescribed, appellate and revisional authorities. [S7]
- 18 August 2021 — Homestay Guidelines corrigendum. Located changes concern numbering/layout rather than a substantive new eligibility regime. [S5]
- 29 November/3 December 2021 — Registration of Tourist Trade (Amendment) Rules, 2021. Corrects particular rules/form references. The official Gazette confirms commencement on Gazette publication. [S3]
- February 2026 — Amendment Bill. The Assembly record shows introduction/passage; final enactment/effective Act text was not established in the reviewed official sources. [S23]
- 2 March 2026 — Amendment Rules, 2026 laid before the Assembly. The title is officially established, but the complete text and Gazette/effective date are Not stated in the current official material reviewed. [S24]
Supersession/currentness assessment
- The 2021 Rules expressly amend the 2020 Rules and must be read with them.
- The 2021 homestay corrigendum does not appear to create a replacement homestay scheme.
- The 2020 fee schedule contains its own three-year limitation and should not be silently carried forward to 2026.
- The 2026 Amendment Rules create an unresolved currentness problem until their complete official text is obtained.
- No official instrument was located expressly rescinding the Homestay Guidelines, but absence of rescission is insufficient to prove that none of their provisions has been affected by the 2026 Rules.
03 / Category definitions
Choose the right accommodation category
| Category | Location | Eligible owner/applicant | Residence requirement | Operator allowed | Capacity | Food position | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homestay | Mizoram; address/local approvals remain separate | Guideline refers to owner/promoter and individuals/families owning a house | Owner/promoter physically resident with family in unit or same premises/campus in close proximity | Independent professional operator replacing resident owner: Not stated in the material reviewed | Guideline max 5 tourist rooms; Annex E min 3/max 5/10 beds | Kitchen/food standards in Annex E; FSSAI separately applicable when a food business is carried on | S2, S4 |
| Bed & Breakfast | Included inside Act's umbrella definition of “hotel” | Separate Mizoram applicant rule Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Separate current capacity rule Not stated in the material reviewed | Separate rule Not stated in the material reviewed | S1 s.2(i) |
| Guest house | State tourist-trade framework | Separate criteria not exhaustively reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | General “hotel keeper” definition recognizes proprietor/manager-operation concepts | Fee schedule historically treated separately | Separate food rules apply as relevant | S1; S6 |
| Hotel | Statewide statutory framework | Persons covered by Act/Rules | No homestay-style resident-owner condition established for general hotels | Statutory hotel-keeper definition includes owner/operator and manager operating for proprietor | Category-specific criteria outside homestay scope | Separate food law | S1 |
| Resort | Included in statutory “hotel” umbrella | Category-specific criteria not established here | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Separate food law | S1 |
| Lodge / Motel / Inn | Tourist-trade framework | Category-specific requirements Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Separate food law | S1/S6 |
| Tourist hostel/dormitory | Tourist-trade fee schedule recognizes category | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | S6 |
| Farm stay | No separate Mizoram statutory category located in reviewed sources | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Annex F may score farm/estate characteristics; that is not a separate category |
| Serviced accommodation | — | Not stated in the current official material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | Not stated in the material reviewed | — |
The Act's broad definition means that “homestay” should not be treated simply as an informal label: it is part of the registered tourist-trade framework. [S1, s.2(i)]
04 / Eligibility decision tree
Check whether the applicant and property qualify
Start with the exact property address and local-body category.
- Is the exact site known?
- No → establish district, village/ward, local council/municipal status, road access and land status before committing capital. Not established in the published material for an address-specific approval.
- Yes → continue.
- Is the applicant the owner/promoter?
- Individual/family owner → continue.
- Long-term lessee → Form 3 contemplates leases, but the guideline says the promoter should own the property. Confirm this in writing with the authority.
- Company/LLP/partnership proposed as registration holder → no explicit homestay provision located confirming that route. Confirm this in writing with the authority.
- Who will physically live at the property?
- Owner/promoter with family in the unit or same premises/campus close by → continue.
- Owner permanently elsewhere, with caretaker only → caretaker substitution is not established in the Mizoram homestay guideline. does not appear to fit the published homestay definition, unless Tourism gives a written contrary interpretation or another category applies.
- Professional manager plus resident owner/family → operational outsourcing may be possible contractually, but the legal status of the manager as operator/registration holder is not established. Continue only after separating owner/resident host from operator.
- How many tourist rooms/beds?
- 3–5 rooms and no more than 10 beds, with standards satisfied → This appears to fit the published route, subject to the remaining checks.
- 1–2 rooms → guideline appears broad enough below its five-room maximum, but Annexure E says minimum three. Confirm this in writing with the authority.
- More than 5 tourist rooms → This does not appear to fit the published route and Consider another accommodation category.
- Does each proposed room/bath meet dimensional and facility standards?
- Yes → continue.
- No → does not appear to fit the published homestay definition/STANDARDS until rectified.
- Is the building existing, proposed, under construction or already operating?
- Existing suitable home → proceed to documentation/inspection.
- Proposed/new construction → local building/land/use permission must be established independently before relying on future homestay registration. Confirm this in writing with the authority where use is uncertain.
- Running unregistered accommodation → the Act requires registration before operation. It should not be assumed that later application cures prior operation. [S1, s.9]
- Existing but >5 guest rooms → Consider another accommodation category.
- Is the property in a protected/forest/heritage/specially controlled site?
- Yes/possibly → Tourism registration alone does not answer those permissions. Confirm this in writing with the authority.
- No identified special restriction → proceed, subject to local building/use review. Use these branches as a starting test and confirm the result for the exact property.
05 / Applicant and operating structures
Set the ownership and operating structure
| Structure | Supported route | Main obstacle | Source | Question requiring clarification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resident individual owner | Strongest published fit: owner holds property, resident family hosts guests | Must meet room, title, police, building and classification conditions | S2/S4 | Confirm 2026 Rules have not changed eligibility |
| Joint/inherited ownership | Form 3 contemplates revenue/title papers and co-sharer affidavit; Act addresses inheritance/devolution | Exact consent standard not fully specified | S1 s.46; S2 Form 3 | Must every co-owner consent, and in what form? |
| Owner living elsewhere | Published residence condition is not met | Caretaker substitution absent from state guideline | S4 | Can any approved non-resident-owner model qualify? |
| Owner using caretaker | Possible operational assistance is not the same as caretaker replacing resident owner | No state homestay provision making caretaker sufficient | S4 | May caretaker manage only while owner/family remain resident? |
| Long-term lessee | Form 3 explicitly mentions owned/leased title and lease deed/certificate | Direct conflict with guideline requiring owner/promoter ownership | S2/S4 | Are registered lessees eligible in 2026? |
| Company | General Act definitions can encompass business operators, but homestay-specific guideline speaks of individuals/families and resident owner | No explicit company-as-homestay-holder rule located | S1/S4 | Can a company hold the certificate where title/resident host is an individual? |
| Partnership firm | No default homestay-holder permission located | Same applicant/residence problem | S4 | Is firm registration possible only by exemption/other category? |
| LLP | Not stated in the current official material reviewed as homestay registration holder | Separate legal personality does not satisfy resident-owner condition by itself | S4 | Can an LLP be registration holder/operator, and on what title/residency model? |
| Professional operator/management company | Can potentially perform contractual management functions, but licensing role is not established | Management agreement cannot rewrite statutory applicant conditions | S1/S4 | Can operator be named on certificate; which duties remain with owner? |
| Capital-only participant, no property | Cannot make a property-specific Tourism application without site/applicant/title facts | Regulatory category not yet determinable | S2/S4 | What ownership/financing structure will ultimately be used? |
| Landowner proposing new construction | Can design toward standards, but Tourism registration does not grant building permission | Land-use/building approval, residence model and room plan must be fixed first | S2/S4 | Will proposed residential/tourist use be accepted locally? |
| Running homestay | Registration route exists | Act expects registration before operation; compliance deficiencies may require correction | S1 s.9 | Does any current regularisation procedure exist? Not stated in the material reviewed |
The Act's general recognition of an owner/operator or manager cannot safely be used to erase the narrower resident-owner conditions in the homestay guideline.
06 / Property and classification standards
Prepare the property for inspection
| Topic | Mandatory / classification / guidance / unclear | Requirement | Applies when | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Mandatory in guideline / conflicting | Owner/promoter “should own” property | Homestay eligibility | S4 eligibility | LOW because Form 3 allows leased title |
| Residence | Mandatory published condition | Owner/promoter physically resides with family in homestay unit or same premises/campus close by | All homestays | S4 | MEDIUM pending 2026 Rules |
| Tourist rooms | Mandatory / conflict | Guideline: max 5; Annex E: min 3, max 5 | All | S4; S2 Annex E | LOW for minimum; MEDIUM for maximum |
| Beds | Mandatory checklist | Max 10 beds | Annex E | S2 Annex E, PDF p.65 | MEDIUM |
| Single room size | Mandatory | ≥100 sq ft | Single room | S2/S4 | MEDIUM |
| Double room size | Mandatory | ≥120 sq ft | Double | S2/S4 | MEDIUM |
| Bathroom | Mandatory | ≥30 sq ft; attached-bathroom standards | Guest rooms | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| WC/shower | Mandatory checklist | Western WC, shower, wash basin, mirror, towel/hook, non-skid impervious flooring | Guest bath | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Water | Mandatory checklist | 24-hour hot and cold water; water-saving fittings | Guest bath | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Electricity | General facility requirement; detailed backup rule unclear | Adequate electricity expected; specific homestay backup-generator requirement Not stated in the material reviewed | Property | S2/S4 | LOW for backup |
| Heating/cooling | Checklist conditional | Fan where no AC; AC/heating according to climate, specified room-temperature performance in checklist | Relevant climate/rooms | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Internet | Classification | Internet receives classification scoring; not established as baseline eligibility | Classification | S2 Annex F | HIGH as classification item |
| Kitchen | Mandatory checklist where food prepared | Hygienic, ventilated, food storage, exhaust; fire extinguisher or blanket; covered drains/soakage arrangement | Food/kitchen | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Dining | Mandatory checklist | Separate clean dining space and furniture | Guest meal service | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Common areas | Standards/classification | Lobby/lounge/dining details captured in Form 3 and classification | Application/classification | S2 Form 3/Annex F | MEDIUM |
| Road access | Published eligibility | Easy access; footpath/track to be in good condition where applicable | All | S4 | MEDIUM |
| Parking | Mandatory checklist | “Adequate parking”; no numerical ratio located | All | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Reception | Operating/display duties | Certificate/rates and other information displayed at entrance/reception; no conventional hotel desk requirement located | Operating | S4 | MEDIUM |
| Signage | Operating + classification | Homestay identification and required displays; signage also appears in scoring | Operating/classification | S4; Annex F | MEDIUM |
| Fire precautions | Mandatory checklist | Adequate fire precautions/equipment; kitchen extinguisher/blanket; smoke/heat detectors | All | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Statewide Fire NOC | Unclear | Not stated in the material reviewed IN CURRENT HOMESTAY SOURCES as an automatic universal attachment | Address-specific | — | LOW |
| Structural certificate | Unclear | Not stated in the current official material reviewed | Address/building-specific | — | LOW |
| Sanitation | Mandatory | Clean/hygienic premises, drainage, bathrooms, kitchen | All | S2/S4 | MEDIUM |
| Waste | Mandatory checklist | Covered garbage bins and lawful disposal | Operating | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| First aid | Mandatory checklist | First-aid arrangements | Operating | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Medical assistance | Mandatory/checklist | Doctor contact information/access | Operating | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Guest safety | Mandatory | Locks, safe custody, fire/safety arrangements; CCTV separately required by guideline | Operating | S2/S4 | MEDIUM |
| CCTV | Mandatory wording | Surveillance at reception and corridors “shall” be installed | Registered operation | S4 operating conditions | MEDIUM |
| Public-liability insurance | Mandatory Annex E item | Insurance including public liability against guest claims | Classification/operation | S2 Annex E | MEDIUM |
| Accessibility | Application field / unclear baseline | Form 3 asks about facilities for differently-abled guests; comprehensive mandatory accessible-design standard Not stated in the material reviewed | Application/classification | S2 Form 3 | LOW |
| Grade | Classification | Gold ≥75; Silver 50–74; Bronze <50 on 100-point Annex F | Inspection/classification | S2 Annex F | MEDIUM |
Because the complete 2026 Amendment Rules are missing, “MEDIUM” is used for many state-rule claims that would otherwise be explicit.
07 / Documents and declarations
Assemble the application file
| Document | Who provides/signs | Format/stamp requirement | Validity period | When required | Source | Unresolved issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form 3 application | Applicant/owner | Prescribed form | Application-specific | New application | S2 Form 3 | Current authenticated digital equivalent not inspected |
| Ownership/revenue papers | Owner/applicant | LSC/Land Pass/revenue/title records as relevant | Not stated | Application | S2/S4 | Exact title acceptable by locality |
| Sale deed | Owner | Copy | Not stated | If owned/title established this way | S2 Form 3 | — |
| Lease deed/Lease Certificate | Lessee/applicant | Copy | Lease term governs; no Tourism minimum term located | Form 3 allows it | S2 Form 3 | Conflicts with S4 ownership requirement |
| Co-sharer affidavit | Co-owner/co-sharer | Affidavit | Not stated in the material reviewed | Joint/co-shared title | S2/S4 | Whether all co-sharers must sign |
| Owner undertaking | Owner | Stamp-paper affidavit; Form 3 document list specifies ₹10 stamp paper | Not stated in the material reviewed | Application | S2 Form 3 | Verify whether stamp value/form changed after 2026 |
| Local police clearance | Owner/promoter | Certificate from local police station | Validity Not stated in the material reviewed | Eligibility/application | S4 | Current digital/police format not located |
| Character certificate separate from police clearance | — | — | — | — | — | Not stated in the current official material reviewed |
| Location plan/map | Applicant | Shows access from major roads; need not be to scale | Application-specific | Application | S4 | Portal file format not inspected |
| Building photographs | Applicant | One hard and one soft-copy set under guideline; building/interiors including bath, living, bedroom, parking | Application-specific | Application | S4 | 2026 portal may have replaced hard-copy process; file type/size not public |
| Certified building plan | Applicant/local authority | Certified by relevant local body | Depends local approval | Application | S4 | Completion/occupancy documents separately Not stated in the material reviewed |
| Blueprint | Applicant | Listed in Form 3 | Application-specific | Application | S2 | Relationship with certified building plan unclear |
| Annexure E checklist | Applicant/inspection process | Certified checklist | Application-specific | Application/inspection | S2/S4 | Who must certify under current portal should be confirmed |
| Police verification | Relevant applicant | Form 3 includes field/document references | Not stated in the material reviewed | Application | S2 | Whether same as local police clearance |
| Form 25 Tourist Register sample/page | Applicant | Signed page listed | — | Application file under Form 3 | S2 | Unusual pre-operation requirement; current portal treatment unknown |
| Bill book | Applicant | Signed/produced; operating guideline requires numbered triplicate bills | — | Application and operation | S2/S4 | Current digital billing acceptance not specified |
| Inspection report | Inspection authority | Official report | Application-specific | Form 3 document list calls for it | S2 | Conflicts with guideline sequence placing inspection after application |
| Old registration certificate | Existing holder | Original/copy as prescribed | Existing certificate | Renewal/duplicate | S4 | Digital handling not inspected |
| Current fee receipt | Applicant | Portal/DD/cash route depending current rules | — | Application/renewal | S4/S6 | CURRENT AMOUNT AND CURRENT PAYMENT ROUTE Not stated in the material reviewed |
| NOCs generally | Depends property | Depends authority | Depends authority | Address-specific | — | No universal homestay NOC matrix located |
No current public portal specification for PDF/JPG extensions, maximum file size or digital-signature requirements was located.
08 / Application and inspection process
Follow the application and inspection process
| Step | Responsible person/authority | Input/document | Resulting record | Stated period | What does not happen automatically |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Address/title eligibility check | Owner/applicant | Address, title, local body, residence model, room plan | Internal go/no-go | None | No reservation of eligibility |
| 2. Public portal account | Applicant | Name, email, register-as selection, district, phone, address, password | User account | Not stated | No approval merely by creating account |
| 3. Homestay application | Applicant | Form 3 + ownership/police/plan/photos/checklist/etc. | Application | Act sets broader disposal provision; guideline has classification target | No registration by submission alone |
| 4. Scrutiny/completeness | Prescribed Authority/Tourism | Complete file | Accepted/queried application | Guideline's 30-day language applies to complete classification process | No guarantee that incomplete application proceeds |
| 5. Physical inspection | Government/private agency/Prescribed Authority as specified | Property + documents | Inspection report/Annex E and Annex F assessment | After application under guideline | No deferment of mandatory inspection under guideline |
| 6. Classification evaluation | Classification authority/committee | Annex E compliance + Annex F score | Gold/Silver/Bronze recommendation/decision | Guideline states classification “would be finalised within 30 days” after complete application | Not a statutory guarantee of overall business commencement |
| 7. Fee payment | Applicant | Current prescribed fee | Payment record | After approval wording appears in guideline | Current fee not established |
| 8. Certificate/registration | Prescribed Authority | Approval + fee/compliance | Registration/classification certificate | Act has 3-month application-disposal wording | Does not grant local building/fire/food/tax permissions |
| 9. Local registration | Owner/operator | Tourism certificate | Local Council/Village Council registration as applicable under guideline | No universal period located | Not automatically completed by Tourism |
| 10. Training | Registered owner/host | Attendance | Training completion | Compulsory after registration under guideline | Nonattendance can jeopardise registration |
| 11. Ongoing inspection | Tourism/authorized agency | Registered premises | Deficiency directions/continued status | Unannounced inspection possible | Certificate does not immunize future noncompliance |
| 12. Appeal/revision | Applicant | Adverse order/classification appeal | Appellate/revisional order | 30-day guideline classification appeal vs 90-day statutory appeal conflict | Appeal does not suspend all other obligations automatically |
Processing-period caution
Section 9(3) of the 2020 Act contains a three-month disposal/deemed-acceptance mechanism for registration applications. The homestay guideline separately says classifications would be finalised within 30 days of receipt of a complete application. These should not be merged into a promise of “approval in 30 days.” [S1, s.9(3); S4, inspection/classification provision] No deemed registration under the Tourism Act should be represented as deeming separate building, fire, food, local-body, environmental, tax or foreigner-reporting compliance.
09 / Fees, timelines, validity and renewal
Confirm fees, timing and certificate validity
| Item | Verified amount/period | Current status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processing fee | ₹20 historically | 31 Jul 2020 schedule only; expressly for three years; CURRENT FEE Not stated in the material reviewed | S6, PDF p.244 |
| Gold registration, 3 years | ₹9,000 historically | Do not publish as current | S6 |
| Silver registration, 3 years | ₹6,000 historically | Do not publish as current | S6 |
| Bronze registration, 3 years | ₹3,000 historically | Do not publish as current | S6 |
| Renewal | 50% of corresponding registration charge historically | Current fee Not stated in the material reviewed | S6 |
| Refund of Tourism registration fee | Not stated in the current official material reviewed | — | — |
| Classification target | 30 days from complete application under guideline wording | Administrative guideline target; not approval guarantee | S4 |
| Registration application disposal | 3 months under 2020 Act s.9(3), with statutory deemed-treatment wording | Must be checked against 2026 amendments before public reliance | S1 s.9(3) |
| Registration/classification validity | 3 years | Published homestay rule | S4 |
| Reclassification application | At least 3 months before expiry | Published guideline | S4 p.176 |
| Renewal-fee timing | Guideline contains a 60-days-before-expiry requirement | Exact current portal sequence unclear | S4 p.176 |
| Changes to facilities | Report within 30 days | Operating obligation | S4 |
| Change/devolution/inheritance under Act | Notify prescribed authority within 60 days | Statutory change mechanism | S1 s.46 |
| Current portal payment method | Not stated in the material reviewed | Authenticated screen not inspected | S8 |
Legacy certificates
A certificate issued for a three-year period should be checked by its actual issue/expiry dates. No official instrument was located automatically extending historical certificates merely because the old fee schedule expired.
10 / Operating duties after registration
Run the registered homestay correctly
Display, rates and billing
Registered homestays are required under the located guideline to maintain/display prescribed information including:
- name/identity of the establishment;
- registration/classification certificate conspicuously;
- Government-approved room tariffs;
- emergency contacts;
- emergency-exit information inside rooms; and
- classification status. The guideline says the owner is to charge Tourism-approved rates and provides for tariff revision through the classification mechanism; the published wording contemplates revisions generally once every two years on application. Bills/receipts and prescribed books must be maintained. [S4, operating provisions]
Guest records
The published state materials require:
- a tourist/guest register;
- guest identity details;
- address and stay information;
- passport particulars for foreigners;
- Government-issued identification information for Indian guests;
- arrival/departure entries;
- visitor records;
- complaint/suggestion book; and
- prescribed bill/receipt records. The guideline also calls for a monthly visitor report to the Director of Tourism and fortnightly guest information to the concerned municipal body and police. [S2 Annex E; S4] The applicable retention period for ordinary domestic guest records is Not stated in the current official material reviewed.
Foreign guests
The state guideline's older references to Form 25/Form C should not be presented as the current national immigration instrument without qualification. The Immigration and Foreigners Rules, 2025 now require an accommodation keeper, including a homestay, to:
- electronically transmit prescribed foreign-guest particulars in Form III no later than 24 hours after arrival;
- transmit departure particulars no later than 24 hours after departure; and
- retain the electronic accommodation record for at least one year. [S11, r.17]
Staff and police verification
- Owner/promoter local police clearance is explicit.
- A universal Mizoram homestay requirement for police verification of every employee or caretaker was Not stated in the current official material reviewed.
- Individual scheme conditions, local police directions or other employment law may add requirements and should be checked separately.
Training
Post-registration training is described as compulsory in the guideline; failure to attend can support cancellation. [S4] A local-employment quota for ordinary Mizoram homestays was Not stated in the current official material reviewed.
Safety and maintenance
Ongoing duties include:
- maintaining cleanliness, hygiene and facilities;
- fire and safety arrangements;
- CCTV at reception/corridors under the published guideline;
- smoke/heat detectors under Annex E;
- proper garbage disposal;
- public-liability insurance under Annex E;
- first-aid/medical contacts;
- maintaining advertised facilities accurately; and
- correcting deficiencies found during inspection.
Food
Tourism classification does not replace food-safety regulation. Where the operator carries on a food business, current FSSAI/FoSCoS rules must be assessed separately. From 1 April 2026 the general turnover categories are:
- Registration: turnover up to ₹1.5 crore;
- State Licence: above ₹1.5 crore and up to ₹50 crore;
- Central Licence: above ₹50 crore. FSSAI licence/registration validity is now perpetual unless suspended, cancelled or surrendered, subject to continuing compliance. [S12] This does not mean that every homestay automatically needs the same FSSAI category; the actual food activity must first be classified.
Tax
Tourism registration does not settle income tax or GST. CBIC's section 22 currently states a ₹10-lakh threshold for taxable supplies made from a special-category state such as Mizoram, subject to other compulsory-registration provisions and the actual supply structure. [S14, CGST Act s.22] GST treatment should be reviewed against the actual owner/operator contracts, turnover, supplies and platform arrangements rather than inferred from the Tourism certificate.
Incident reporting
A separate comprehensive state homestay incident-reporting rule beyond ordinary police/emergency obligations was Not stated in the current official material reviewed.
11 / Adjacent approvals and dependencies
Close the approvals outside Tourism
| Topic | What Tourism registration resolves | What it does not resolve | Likely authority | Official source located | Property-specific question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land/title | Checks title documents for Tourism file | Validity of disputed title, inheritance, encumbrances | Revenue/registration/local authority | S2/S4 | Who legally owns and may use the site? |
| Lease | Form 3 recognizes lease documentation | Whether lessee qualifies despite ownership guideline | Tourism + land authority | S2/S4 | Is this lease acceptable for homestay registration? |
| Building use | Tourism asks for certified plan | Sanctioned use, conversion, setbacks, occupancy/completion legality | Relevant local body | S4 | Is paying-guest/tourist use permitted at exact address? |
| Building plan | Requires certified plan | Does not issue the plan | Local body | S4 | Is existing construction fully sanctioned? |
| Completion/occupancy | — | Tourism materials reviewed do not establish a blanket certificate exemption | Local body | Not stated in the material reviewed | Which certificate applies to this building/date? |
| Fire | Inspects/checks fire equipment and safety standards | Does not itself establish whether separate Fire NOC required | Fire & Emergency Services/local body | S2 | Is an NOC mandatory at this size/use? |
| Food | Kitchen standards | FSSAI registration/licence | FSSAI/state food safety | S12/S13 | What food activity/turnover category applies? |
| Police | Owner clearance/guest reporting | Broader police/security compliance | Mizoram Police/FRO | S4/S11 | Staff/caretaker verification required locally? |
| Foreign guests | State guest register supports information collection | National Form III immigration reporting | Bureau of Immigration/FRO/MHA | S11 | Which current state entry/PAP direction governs guest? |
| Environment | Responsible-tourism standards | Forest/EC/protected/river permissions | Environment/Forest/local regulator | Property-specific | Is site inside/near restricted land? |
| Waste | Checklist requires lawful disposal | Local collection/consent arrangements | Local body | S2 | What disposal system is approved? |
| Local Council/Village Council | Tourism certificate precedes local registration | Does not complete local registration automatically | Concerned Local/Village Council | S4 | What documents/fee apply locally? |
| Municipal/Nagar Panchayat | Tourism category | Local trade/use/property requirements | Relevant local body | Address-specific | Which local law covers site? |
| GST | None | Registration, invoicing and tax liability | CBIC/GST authorities | S14 | Who supplies accommodation/food and receives consideration? |
| Udyam | None | MSME status | Ministry of MSME | S15 | Which entity, if any, qualifies and needs Udyam? |
| Water | Guideline contemplates facilities and historical concession | Connection legality/tariff implementation | Utility/local authority | S4 only | Is domestic tariff available to this registered property? |
| Electricity | Same | Connection/load/tariff classification | Power utility | S4 only | Does utility recognize homestay domestic tariff concession? |
| Property tax | Guideline describes residential treatment | Actual assessment by relevant authority | Local tax authority | S4 only | Has concession been implemented for this property class? |
| Protected/special location | None | Special-entry/environment/forest/heritage controls | Relevant regulator | No blanket homestay rule located | Exact coordinates and protected status? |
12 / Incentives, subsidy and funding
Evaluate incentives without assuming sanction
A. Mizoram Homestay Guidelines — state-listed facilitation/concessions
The guideline lists benefits for duly registered homestays including:
- use of Mizoram Tourism branding;
- domestic electricity/water-rate treatment;
- residential property-tax treatment by appropriate authorities;
- facilitation of loans from financial institutions for improvement/conversion of existing houses;
- training;
- listing on Tourism websites/brochures;
- possible participation in tourism fairs/B2B activity; and
- recognition/award opportunities. [S4, incentives section, PDF pp.179–180] Important limitation: no separate current utility order, property-tax order, loan-sanction mechanism or automatic entitlement instrument was located during this review. The applicant should therefore not model a domestic tariff, tax saving or loan as guaranteed until confirmed with the actual competent authority. There is also an internal source conflict because an eligibility line says the proposed homestay should not be enjoying benefits under a State/Central policy/Act/guideline while the same Homestay Guidelines later enumerate benefits for registered homestays. See §17.
B. UNNATI 2024 — DPIIT Homestay Guidelines
The official DPIIT Homestay Guidelines under UNNATI 2024 recognize homestays as eligible service-sector projects subject to the scheme's separate investment, registration, location and sanction conditions. [S17] Key scheme conditions located include:
- minimum eligible investment of ₹50 lakh;
- separate UNNATI registration/approval rather than automatic eligibility from a Tourism certificate;
- state Tourism registration and other statutory licences;
- location-linked requirements, including scheme guidance concerning proximity to identified tourist attractions/events;
- investment/appraisal documentation and DIC/state/DPIIT implementation stages;
- scheme-specific room/caretaker/title provisions that do not amend Mizoram's homestay registration rules. The scheme's Capital Investment Incentive formula distinguishes Zone A/Zone B and GST-applicable/non-applicable units, with separate ceilings; Capital Interest Subvention and Manufacturing & Services Linked Incentive are also scheme-specific. Do not use the UNNATI capacity wording as Mizoram licensing permission. The UNNATI homestay document permits a broader scheme range than Mizoram's located five-room homestay ceiling. State Tourism eligibility remains separately necessary. Application status: the statutory/official UNNATI registration period was subsequently extended in 2026, but the official UNNATI implementation portal was found to state that further registrations had been stopped because applications exceeded available funding. Accordingly, a prospective 2026 applicant must not be promised an open intake merely from the formal end date. Assistance is not automatic: registration, appraisal, location eligibility, expenditure eligibility, fund availability and sanction all matter.
C. PM-JUGA — Development of Homestays in Tribal Areas
The Ministry of Tourism scheme provides, subject to the State/UT cluster route:
- up to ₹5 lakh per village for community requirements;
- up to ₹5 lakh per household for construction of two new rooms; and
- up to ₹3 lakh per household for renovation of existing rooms. The scheme contemplates 5–10 homestays per village in a cluster of 5–6 villages, with assistance to a State/UT capped at ₹5 crore under the guidelines. [S18] For Mizoram, an official 2026 project list records: > Development of Tribal Homestays in Central and Southern clusters, Mizoram — sanctioned cost ₹5.00 crore. [S19] This is not a general ₹5-lakh grant automatically available to any Mizoram property owner. The State identifies the eligible villages/beneficiaries and submits/implements the sanctioned cluster project.
- Current named beneficiary villages: Not stated in the current official material reviewed reviewed here.
- Current public individual application window: Not stated in the material reviewed.
- Current Mizoram beneficiary-disbursement status: Not stated in the material reviewed in a sufficiently recent project-specific official release.
D. PMMY/MUDRA for homestays
The Ministry of Tourism confirms that a homestay category was introduced under PMMY and that rural homestays may use the Jan Samarth route. [S22] Current general PMMY limits are:
| Category | Loan amount |
|---|---|
| Shishu | Up to ₹50,000 |
| Kishore | Above ₹50,000 to ₹5 lakh |
| Tarun | Above ₹5 lakh to ₹10 lakh |
| Tarun Plus | Above ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh, limited to entrepreneurs who previously successfully repaid a Tarun loan |
PMMY is institutional collateral-free credit, not a subsidy; sanction is by participating banks/NBFCs/MFIs and other member lending institutions. Interest rate, repayment period, underwriting and disbursement are lender-specific. [S21] No property acquisition or operating plan should assume that digital eligibility equals lender sanction.
13 / Business implications
Translate the rules into a workable project
Before selecting or acquiring a property
For each proposed project, establish at minimum:
- exact address and local-body jurisdiction;
- current title and all co-owner interests;
- whether ownership is individual, joint, inherited or leased;
- proposed Tourism-registration holder;
- who will actually live on the premises;
- whether the owner/promoter residence condition is achievable;
- tourist-room/bed plan;
- whether a one- or two-room configuration is contemplated;
- sanctioned building status;
- road/access position;
- protected/forest/environmental constraints;
- applicable local registration/trade requirements; and
- whether any proposed incentive is genuinely open and property-applicable. A capital-only participant should therefore begin with regulatory/property screening rather than assuming a corporate wrapper creates homestay eligibility.
Before construction or renovation
Design should be tested against:
- 100/120 sq ft room minima;
- 30 sq ft bathroom minimum;
- attached bathroom requirements;
- hot/cold water;
- drainage;
- dining/kitchen arrangements;
- fire equipment/detectors;
- guest safety;
- waste;
- access;
- parking;
- insurance;
- classification requirements; and
- local building rules. Tourism standards do not substitute for sanctioned planning/building permission.
Registration holder versus operating entity
The Act's generic “hotel keeper” concept accommodates owner/operator/manager relationships at a broad tourist-trade level. The homestay-specific guideline, however, is based around a resident owner/promoter and individuals/families. Therefore:
- it is not established that a professional management company may itself be the homestay certificate holder;
- it is not established that an LLP may replace the individual resident owner;
- it is not established that management-contract control can cure a non-resident owner;
- a lease is specifically contemplated in Form 3 but conflicts with the published ownership eligibility condition. A management agreement may allocate commercial and operational responsibilities between parties, but it cannot independently create regulatory eligibility.
Property-development scope
Any construction, extension, conversion or material alteration depends on:
- title/lease rights;
- local building permission;
- land/use status;
- engineering compliance;
- address-specific fire/environment rules; and
- eventual Tourism inspection.
Property assessment/commercial planning file
A project property assessment should expressly record:
- title status;
- co-owner consent;
- applicant/resident-host structure;
- room count and bed count;
- room/bath measurements;
- local building file;
- safety deficiencies;
- utility position;
- local registration requirements;
- FSSAI implications;
- foreign-guest workflow;
- insurance;
- current fee uncertainty;
- incentives only as conditional/upside items; and
- unresolved written-authority questions. No fixed ownership percentage, capital contribution or income commitment can be derived from the Tourism rules.
14 / Official-source conflicts
Resolve conflicting official instructions
Conflict 1 — minimum number of rooms
Source A: Homestay Guidelines, eligibility section. Proposition: an individual/family may make available up to five rooms; no minimum is stated. Source B: Annexure E to the Registration Rules/checklist. Proposition: minimum three lettable rooms, maximum five rooms/ten beds. Affected properties: proposed one- and two-room homestays. Hierarchy/date resolution: no amendment expressly resolving the contradiction was located. Status: The official sources are not aligned. Written authority required: Director of Tourism/concerned Prescribed Authority and classification authority.
Conflict 2 — owner versus lessee
Source A: Homestay Guidelines eligibility item 1. Proposition: owner/promoter should own the property. Source B: Form 3 under the Rules. Proposition: title is expressly requested as owned/leased, with sale/lease deed documentation and Lease Certificate references. Affected properties: long-term lessees; owner/operator lease structures; company leases. Hierarchy: Form 3 is within the statutory Rules, while the Homestay Guidelines provide category-specific eligibility. The documents do not say how to reconcile them. Status: The official sources are not aligned.
Conflict 3 — appeal period
Source A: Act s.35. Proposition: appeal from an order under the Act within 90 days of communication, subject to delayed admission for sufficient cause. Source B: Homestay Guidelines. Proposition: appeal concerning classification/reclassification is stated within 30 days to the Secretary, Tourism. Affected properties: applicants challenging classification/refusal. These may represent a special administrative classification route versus the broader statutory appeal, but the source does not expressly reconcile them. Status: The official sources are not aligned / scope clarification required. Practical risk control: do not rely on the longer period where a 30-day classification appeal may apply.
Conflict 4 — inspection report at application stage
Source A: Form 3 document list. Proposition: an Inspection Report appears among application documents. Source B: Homestay Guidelines process. Proposition: physical inspection occurs after application. Affected properties: all new applicants. Status: The official sources are not aligned as to staging.
Conflict 5 — “no benefits” eligibility language versus incentive section
Source A: Homestay eligibility clause. Proposition: proposed homestay language includes not enjoying benefits under State/Central policy/Act/guidelines. Source B: Homestay Guidelines incentives section. Proposition: duly registered homestays are specifically eligible for listed benefits/facilitation. Affected properties: subsidised/concession-backed properties. The first clause may intend to prevent overlapping pre-existing benefits, but that interpretation is not expressly established. Status: The official sources are not aligned.
Conflict 6 — Protected Area Permit information for foreigners
Source A: current Mizoram Tourism foreign-entry information page says, following the 17 December 2024 change described there, foreigners are to use the PAP/e-FRRO process and accommodation providers must lodge foreigner details. [S9] Source B: current Mizoram Tourism “Entry Formalities” page says foreign tourists are not required to obtain Protected Area Permit, except specified nationalities/origins requiring prior MHA approval. [S10] Affected persons: foreign guests and accommodation providers advising them. Status: The official sources are not aligned. The accommodation provider's national Form III reporting duty is separately clear under S11 and should not be conflated with guest-entry permission.
Conflict 7 — UNNATI room rules versus Mizoram homestay licensing
UNNATI's funding guidelines use scheme-specific capacity/title/caretaker parameters that are broader than the state homestay material. [S17] This is principally a scope conflict, not proof of statutory repeal. A central funding guideline cannot safely be read as expanding the state licence to nine rooms or replacing the resident-owner model. Practical rule: a Mizoram project seeking UNNATI support must independently satisfy the state Tourism registration that is actually applicable.
Conflict 8 — UNNATI's FSSAI wording versus current FSSAI framework
UNNATI's homestay document contains scheme-era food-licensing wording, while FSSAI changed the general licensing/registration thresholds and validity framework from 1 April 2026. [S12/S17] For food law, current FSSAI rules govern. For UNNATI's own documentary checklist, DPIIT/DIC should confirm whether its older scheme field has been administratively updated.
Conflict/currentness gap 9 — 2026 Amendment Rules
The Assembly officially records that Amendment Rules, 2026 were laid on 2 March 2026, but their complete text was not located. [S24] This means individual 2020/2021 rule statements cannot yet be described as the entire current rulebook.
Conflict/currentness gap 10 — fees
The only located state Tourism fee notification expressly covered three years from 2020. No later schedule was located. Status: CURRENT FEE Not stated in the current official material reviewed.
16 / Source register
Official source register
| ID | Issuing body | Document or portal | Document/order number | Published | Effective | Language | Status/currentness | Official URL | Pages/sections reviewed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Government of Mizoram / Tourism | Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) Act, 2020 | Act title in Tourism compendium | 2020 | Gazette commencement provision | English | PRIMARY; subject to checking later legislative amendments | Official Tourism compendium PDF | ss.1–2, 9, 35, 37, 46–51; PDF pp.31–45 | Filename pages-15-compendium-of-tourism-act-rules-guidelines-orders-etc.pdf; |
| S2 | Government of Mizoram / Tourism | Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) Rules, 2020, including Form 3, Annexures E/F | Principal Rules, 2020 | 2020 | Gazette publication | English | PRIMARY/FORM; 2026 amendment text outstanding | Same compendium | Rules; Form 3 PDF pp.76–77; Annex E pp.65–66; Annex F | |
| S3 | Government of Mizoram / Tourism | Mizoram Registration of Tourist Trade (Amendment) Rules, 2021 | No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR | 29 Nov 2021 | 3 Dec 2021 Gazette | English | PRIMARY | Official Gazette copy of 2021 Amendment Rules | Rules 1–6+ | Primarily corrective amendments; Issue No.593 |
| S4 | Tourism Department, Mizoram | Guidelines for Registration and Classification of Homestay Establishments | No. C.31012/3/2020-TOUR/9 | 28 Aug 2020 | Published/implemented under Tourism framework | English | IMPLEMENTATION; currentness caveat because 2026 rules text missing | Official Tourism compendium PDF | PDF pp.172–181 | Main homestay instrument |
| S5 | Tourism Department, Mizoram | Corrigendum to Homestay Guidelines | No. C.31012/3/2020-TOUR/3 | 18 Aug 2021 | 2021 | English | IMPLEMENTATION | Same compendium | PDF p.182 | Numbering corrections; no located substantive eligibility change |
| S6 | Tourism Department, Mizoram | Tourist-trade fee notification | No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR | 31 Jul 2020 | Expressly for 3 years | English | PRIMARY/HISTORICAL; NOT RELIABLE AS CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE | Same compendium | PDF p.244 | |
| S7 | Government of Mizoram / Tourism | Prescribed/Appellate/Revisional Authority notification | No. C.31012/1/2020-TOUR/11 | 14 Sep 2020 | 2020 | English | PRIMARY/CONTACT | Same compendium | PDF p.250 | Director/SDO; Secretary; Chief Secretary |
| S8 | Mizoram Tourism | Live registration/signup portal | — | Current page | Current | English | PORTAL | Mizoram Tourism registration portal | Public signup only | Authenticated workflow not accessed |
| S9 | Mizoram Tourism | Foreign entry/PAP information page | — | Current site | Current page | English | PORTAL/GUIDANCE | Foreign-entry information | Foreign entry/reporting text | Conflicts with S10 on PAP |
| S10 | Mizoram Tourism | Entry Formalities | — | Current site | Current page | English | PORTAL/GUIDANCE | Entry Formalities page | Foreign tourist paragraph | Says PAP not required; conflicts with S9 |
| S11 | Ministry of Home Affairs | Immigration and Foreigners Rules, 2025 | G.S.R.596(E) | 1 Sep 2025 | 1 Sep 2025 | English/Hindi Gazette | CENTRAL/PRIMARY | Immigration and Foreigners Rules, 2025 | r.17 and definitions/forms | Supersedes specified older rules |
| S12 | FSSAI | Licensing & Registration Amendment Regulations implementation FAQ/order | File No. RCD-01002/1/2021-Regulatory-FSSAI-Part(1) | 13 & 27 Mar 2026 | Revised thresholds 1 Apr 2026 | English | CENTRAL/PRIMARY/IMPLEMENTATION | FSSAI 2026 FAQ | FAQ Q1–Q4 | Perpetual validity; revised thresholds |
| S13 | FSSAI/FoSCoS | Kind of Business Eligibility | updated 1 Apr 2026 | 1 Apr 2026 | Current | English | CENTRAL/PORTAL | FoSCoS current eligibility material | Food-services categories | Current category/fee implementation |
| S14 | CBIC | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, s.22 | CGST Act | Current consolidated official page | Current | English | CENTRAL/PRIMARY | CBIC CGST Act section 22 | s.22 | Actual GST liability can depend on s.24 and transaction structure |
| S15 | Ministry of MSME | Udyam Registration portal/classification | S.O.1364(E) underlying update | Current; thresholds from 1 Apr 2025 | 1 Apr 2025 | English | CENTRAL/PORTAL | Official Udyam portal | Classification and registration information | Udyam is not shown as a basic Mizoram homestay registration prerequisite |
| S16 | DPIIT | UNNATI 2024 scheme | F.No. P-44015/1/2023-DBA-II | Mar 2024 | As notified | English | CENTRAL/PRIMARY | DPIIT UNNATI scheme page | Scheme framework | Separate incentive approval |
| S17 | DPIIT | Homestay Guidelines under UNNATI 2024 | Annexure-I | Jun 2025 posting | Scheme implementation | English | CENTRAL/SCHEME | UNNATI Homestay Guidelines PDF | Full guideline | Does not replace Mizoram licensing law |
| S18 | Ministry of Tourism | Development of Homestays in Tribal Areas under PM-JUGA | July 2025 guidelines | 1 Jul 2025 | Scheme guidelines | English | CENTRAL/SCHEME | Official PM-JUGA homestay scheme evidence | Scheme limits/cluster model | State proposal/beneficiary route |
| S19 | Ministry of Tourism / PIB | Mizoram PM-JUGA sanction status | Parliamentary/PIB project list | 2026 | Project-specific | English | CENTRAL/IMPLEMENTATION | Mizoram tribal-homestay sanction entry | Mizoram row | ₹5 crore sanctioned project |
| S20 | Ministry of Tourism | Rural tourism/homestay funding status | Lok Sabha reply | 9 Mar 2026 | Current response | English | CENTRAL/IMPLEMENTATION | Promotion of Rural Tourism reply | PM-JUGA/MUDRA paragraphs | Confirms assistance ceilings and MUDRA route |
| S21 | Department of Financial Services | Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana | PMMY | Updated 5 Feb 2026 | Current | English | CENTRAL | Official PMMY page | Loan categories | Credit, not grant |
| S22 | Ministry of Tourism | MUDRA route for homestays | Parliamentary response/guide references | 2025–26 | Current | English | CENTRAL/IMPLEMENTATION | Official homestay MUDRA confirmation | Homestay paragraph | Jan Samarth route |
| S23 | Mizoram Legislative Assembly | Mizoram (Registration of Tourist Trade) (Amendment) Bill, 2026 | Bill No.40/2026 | Feb 2026 | Enactment not established from reviewed material | English | PRIMARY/CURRENTNESS CHECK | Official 2026 Amendment Bill PDF | Objects/reasons and bill | Do not treat as enacted merely because passed |
| S24 | Mizoram Legislative Assembly | List of Business, Ninth Sitting | 2 Mar 2026 | 2 Mar 2026 | — | English | PRIMARY/CURRENTNESS CHECK | Assembly List of Business | Item 3(i) | Confirms 2026 Amendment Rules were laid; full text not located |
Currentness conclusion: S24 means the 2022 Tourism compendium cannot safely be treated as an exhaustive statement of the Rules as at 05 September 2026.
Review and corrections
Keep the guide current.
Sources were checked on . Recheck the live application route before filing because portals and implementation instructions can change.
Send a correction with the relevant official source. Browse all states and Union territories.
